Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur / A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion

Introducción y objetivos: La medición precisa de la torsión femoral es esencial para el diagnóstico, indicación y planificación preoperatoria de las osteotomías desrotadoras femorales en pacientes con inestabilidad patelofemoral o dolor anterior de rodilla. Se han descrito múltiples métodos de medición, con valores muy diferentes entre ellos y ninguno de ellos permite establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria para devolver la torsión a valores normales. El objetivo del presente trabajo es desarrollar un método de medición que permita no solo el diagnóstico de pacientes con alteraciones torsionales, sino también establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria durante la cirugía. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron 30 pacientes sin antecedentes de patología patelofemoral que disponían de una tomografía completa de miembros inferiores por otros motivos, siendo considerados así pacientes normales. Se calculó su torsión femoral mediante los métodos de Jeanmart y de Murphy por dos radiólogos independientes. Por otra parte, dos cirujanos ortopédicos independientes realizaron la medición de la torsión mediante el método 3D propuesto. Se evaluó el comportamiento normal de los datos y se definió la variabilidad intra- e interobservador del método 3D mediante su coeficiente de correlación intraclase y mediante el gráfico de Bland-Altman, realizando una comparación cuantitativa y cualitativa respectivamente con los métodos clásicos. Se estableció el intervalo de confianza de los valores normales con el nuevo método 3D y finalmente, se analizó al patrón de regresión lineal entre los métodos de Jeanmart y Murphy con el método de medición 3D. Resultados: La media de torsión femoral con el método 3D fue de 12,74° (DE 5,96°, IC 95%: 11,67 a 13,82°). Con el método de Jeanmart, esta fue de 12,84° (DE 8,60°, IC 95%: 11,28 a 14,39°) y de 15,87° (DE 10,68°, IC 95%: 13,94 a 17,80°) con el método de Murphy.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. Material and methods: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland–Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. Results: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high.(AU)

[Translated article] A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion / Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur

Introducción y objetivos: La medición precisa de la torsión femoral es esencial para el diagnóstico, indicación y planificación preoperatoria de las osteotomías desrotadoras femorales en pacientes con inestabilidad patelofemoral o dolor anterior de rodilla. Se han descrito múltiples métodos de medición, con valores muy diferentes entre ellos y ninguno de ellos permite establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria para devolver la torsión a valores normales. El objetivo del presente trabajo es desarrollar un método de medición que permita no solo el diagnóstico de pacientes con alteraciones torsionales, sino también establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria durante la cirugía. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron 30 pacientes sin antecedentes de patología patelofemoral que disponían de una tomografía completa de miembros inferiores por otros motivos, siendo considerados así pacientes normales. Se calculó su torsión femoral mediante los métodos de Jeanmart y de Murphy por dos radiólogos independientes. Por otra parte, dos cirujanos ortopédicos independientes realizaron la medición de la torsión mediante el método 3D propuesto. Se evaluó el comportamiento normal de los datos y se definió la variabilidad intra- e interobservador del método 3D mediante su coeficiente de correlación intraclase y mediante el gráfico de Bland-Altman, realizando una comparación cuantitativa y cualitativa respectivamente con los métodos clásicos. Se estableció el intervalo de confianza de los valores normales con el nuevo método 3D y finalmente, se analizó al patrón de regresión lineal entre los métodos de Jeanmart y Murphy con el método de medición 3D. Resultados: La media de torsión femoral con el método 3D fue de 12,74° (DE 5,96°, IC 95%: 11,67 a 13,82°). Con el método de Jeanmart, esta fue de 12,84° (DE 8,60°, IC 95%: 11,28 a 14,39°) y de 15,87° (DE 10,68°, IC 95%: 13,94 a 17,80°) con el método de Murphy.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. Material and methods: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland–Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. Results: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high.(AU)

[Translated article] A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland-Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. RESULTS: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67°-13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28°-14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94°-17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high. CONCLUSION: The method presented in this study allows for the reliable quantification of femoral torsion in a reproducible way. This method can be applied in several open access 3D image programmes what makes its implementation in the healthcare centres possible from now on.

A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion. / Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland-Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. RESULTS: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high. CONCLUSION: The method presented in this study allows for the reliable quantification of femoral torsion in a reproducible way. This method can be applied in several open access 3D image programs what makes its implementation in the healthcare centers possible from now on.

Artroplastia patelar en dolor anterior de rodilla persistente tras prótesis total de rodilla: ¿se tomó la decisión correcta? / Patellar arthroplasty in persistent anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: was the right decision made?

Antecedentes y Objetivo La artroplastia patelar es objeto de discusión en el tratamiento del dolor anterior de rodilla tras PTR (Prótesis Total de Rodilla). Analizamos la asociación entre variables clínicas y radiológicas con atención al conflicto de espacio en el compartimento femoropatelar. Materiales y Método Serie de 22 casos de PTR con dolor anterior de rodilla persistente y posterior artroplastia patelar en segundo tiempo. Los cambios femoropatelares se cuantificaron mediante las variables Overstuffing (sobrecarga femoral) y la definida como Volumen Patelar. Resultados El dolor anterior de rodilla mejoró según la Escala Visual Analógica EVA (7 a 4 puntos; 3 ± 1,97) y la Escala de Dolor Femoropatelar (12,3 a 20,9 puntos; 8,7 ± 4,6). Tras ambos procedimientos (PTR y resurfacing patelar), el Volumen Patelar se vio incrementado (3045,7 mm3 ± 11552,7), así como el Grosor Patelar (4,35 mm ± 2,8) y el Overstuffing Anterior (131,87% ± 38.5%). Conclusiones La mejoría del dolor anterior de rodilla en pacientes con PTR tras artroplastia patelar secundaria ha sido discreta y posiblemente debido a un origen multifactorial. La modificación en el compartimento femoropatelar se produjo a expensas del aumento del volumen patelar y de la sobrecarga femoral anterior. (AU)

Background and objectives: Patellar arthroplasty is the subject of discussion in the treatment of anterior knee pain after TKA (Total Knee Replacement). We analyze the association be-tween clinical and radiological variables with attention to the conflict of space in the patellofemoral compartment. Material and methods: Series of 22 cases with anterior knee pain following TKR. Alterations in the anterior compartment were quantified using the variables of Overstuffing and the one defined as Patellar Volume. Results: Anterior knee pain slightly improved according to the VAS (7 to 4 points; 3 ± 1.97) and the Patellofemoral Pain Score (12.3 at 20.9 points; 8.7 ± 4.6). After both procedures (TKA and patellar resurfacing), Patellar volume increased (3045.7 mm3 ± 11552.7), as well as Patellar Thickness (4.35 mm ± 2.8) and Anterior Overstuffing (131.87% ± 38.5%). Conclusions: The improvement of anterior knee pain in patients with TKA after secondary patellar arthroplasty has been modest and possibly due to a multifactorial origin. The change in the patellofemoral compartment occurred at the expense of increased patellar volume and anterior femoral overload. (AU)

Coronal patellar osteotomy of the external facet combined with the release of the lateral retinaculum improves the clinical outcomes of isolated lateral release in lateral knee compartment syndrome. / La osteotomía patelar coronal de la faceta externa asociada a liberación del retináculo lateral mejora los resultados clínicos de la liberación lateral aislada en el síndrome de compresión lateral de rótula.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel coronal osteotomy of the external facet of the patella, and to evaluate if the outcomes of the treatment of lateral knee compartment syndrome (LKCS) with this osteotomy, combined with the release of the external lateral retinaculum, are better than the isolated lateral retinacular release. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study with a 2 year follow up that included 70 patients diagnosed with LKCS, distributed into 2 groups. The first group included 50 patients on whom the lateral retinacular release combined with osteotomy was performed, and a second group on whom an isolated retinacular release was performed. Measurements were made using the Werner functional scale before the surgery and at 3, 12, and 24 months follow-up. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the overall functional state between the two groups after the surgery (better in the osteotomy group at all the intervals, P<.05). The improvement, which was progressive up to 12 months, was slightly less at 24 months, although the values were still better than the pre-surgical ones in both groups. Pain was the variable that showed most improvement. The patients with LKCS with degenerative signs showed a benefit in all cases. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the described patellar osteotomy technique, combined with lateral retinacular release, significantly improves the pain and the functional scale score of patients with LKCS after 2 years of follow-up, to a greater extent than isolated lateral retinacular release, including those in which there was evidence of degenerative signs.